Iko Roof Shingles Lawsuit

Average iko consumer ratings are poor dragged down by widespread failure of organic shingles and the cambridge ar line.

Iko roof shingles lawsuit.

In a series of consumer reports tests designed to ascertain the best asphalt roof shingles they discovered that the leading shingles outperformed the others by more than 50 in efficacy. Iko roofing shingles products liability. Customers are seeking approval for a 30 million settlement that would resolve multidistrict litigation claiming that iko manufacturing s roof shingles deteriorate earlier than the company says they will. Iko shingles are incapable of withstanding strong winds.

District court for the central district of illinois the named plaintiffs representatives of owners of buildings on which iko organic asphalt roofing shingles the shingles were installed alleged that the shingles were defective or failed to perform as promised. This settlement resolves a long hard fought combined class action against a number of iko companies who manufactured or sold certain organic asphalt roofing shingles primarily between 1978 and 2008. Iko roofing shingle products liability litigation mdl docket no. Wind storms can easily cause serious damage to their shingles that require emergency repairs.

The proposed settlement was brought forward to an illinois judge and would end a nine year multidistrict litigation against iko manufacturing. In this litigation in re. Iko warranted and represented that the shingles now known to be defective conformed to and had been designed to meet or exceed industry standards. A settlement has been reached in the litigation.

However the defective shingle lines are no longer produced and iko has been working hard on improving formulations across the board. Machine fibers ltd for the alleged negligent design and manufacture of iko organic shingles. Consumer reports determined the best roof shingles. Best shingle according to consumer reports.

When i do roof repairs after wind storms literally almost 100 of the repairs i do are to iko shingles. Iko defective roof shingles class action lawsuit. This class action lawsuit claims that iko cambridge ar roof shingles are defective and prone to premature blistering tearing cracking delamination granule loss degradation and loss of adhesion at the seal strip between adjacent shingles. The representative plaintiff on behalf of himself and the class claimed damages from the defendants iko industries ltd canroof corporation inc and i g.

The plaintiffs claimed that the shingles were defective and tended to crack curl blister fishmouth claw discolor break or otherwise not perform according to reasonable expectations. This can cause the shingles to crack blister curl or blow off the roof and can also damage interior walls ceilings and other household structures. Out of all shingles iko are the weakest and are the most prone to damage and wear in tear. 2104 filed in the u s.

2 2018 prnewswire lockridge grindal nauen p l l p halunen law and levin sedran berman counsel for the plaintiffs in in re.